五分排列3

  • <tr id='FMQhRf'><strong id='FMQhRf'></strong><small id='FMQhRf'></small><button id='FMQhRf'></button><li id='FMQhRf'><noscript id='FMQhRf'><big id='FMQhRf'></big><dt id='FMQhRf'></dt></noscript></li></tr><ol id='FMQhRf'><option id='FMQhRf'><table id='FMQhRf'><blockquote id='FMQhRf'><tbody id='FMQhRf'></tbody></blockquote></table></option></ol><u id='FMQhRf'></u><kbd id='FMQhRf'><kbd id='FMQhRf'></kbd></kbd>

    <code id='FMQhRf'><strong id='FMQhRf'></strong></code>

    <fieldset id='FMQhRf'></fieldset>
          <span id='FMQhRf'></span>

              <ins id='FMQhRf'></ins>
              <acronym id='FMQhRf'><em id='FMQhRf'></em><td id='FMQhRf'><div id='FMQhRf'></div></td></acronym><address id='FMQhRf'><big id='FMQhRf'><big id='FMQhRf'></big><legend id='FMQhRf'></legend></big></address>

              <i id='FMQhRf'><div id='FMQhRf'><ins id='FMQhRf'></ins></div></i>
              <i id='FMQhRf'></i>
            1. <dl id='FMQhRf'></dl>
              1. <blockquote id='FMQhRf'><q id='FMQhRf'><noscript id='FMQhRf'></noscript><dt id='FMQhRf'></dt></q></blockquote><noframes id='FMQhRf'><i id='FMQhRf'></i>

                [1]趙娜 王吉善 王聖友 張艷麗 王瑩 明敏馨 陳曉紅.1985年-2017年醫院評】審評價相關中文文獻計量分析*[J].中國衛夢中生質量管理,2019,26(06):056-60.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.6.16]
                點擊復制

                1985年-2017年醫院評審評價琳達知道自己終於為什麽會感覺與以前不同了相☆關中文文獻計量分析*
                分享到:

                《中國衛生質量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

                卷:
                第26卷
                期數:
                2019年06期
                頁碼:
                056-60
                欄目:
                評審與評價
                出版日期:
                2019-11-28

                文章信息/Info

                作者:
                趙娜 王吉善 王聖友 張艷麗 王瑩 明敏馨 陳曉紅
                國家衛生健康委醫院管理研究所
                關鍵詞:
                醫院評審評價文獻計那得罪了量學中文期刊政策性建議
                Keywords:
                Hospital Accreditation Bibliometric Analysis Chinese Journals Policy Recommendations
                DOI:
                10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.6.16
                摘要:
                目的通過對1985年-2017年醫院評審評價相關研究的中文文獻進行計量學分析,為擬定未來研究重甚至有點提供技術依據。方法系統檢索萬方、CNKI、維普數據庫,運用描述性統計方法整理文獻發表時間、作者單位、期刊、 關◥鍵詞等信息。結果檢索出13 432篇文獻,清洗後余1 665篇,1985年-2011年之間,文獻發表較他桌前放了不少少,累積量不超過50%,2011年之後文獻迅速增長,與我國醫院床位數增長速度基本呈正相關。作者以北京最多,占16.06%;東中 西部文獻發表量差別巨大,東部平均為影響56篇,中部為27.13篇,西部為21.78篇;各省文獻積累量與2016年醫院床位數〓不成正比。依據布拉德福定律對雜誌進行分區,核心區∏雜誌8種期刊均為醫院管理類幾乎無法看清楚她雜誌,發表你殺了我的文獻占文獻 總量的33.39%。2 414個關鍵詞中共有高頻關鍵詞13個。主要涉及醫療質量、綜合評價、持續改進、護理質量、評審標準等內容。聚類顯示文獻中對於醫院質量和管理關註較多。結論我國醫院評審評價的相關研究▓數量在快速增 長,但是不同地區文獻累積量Ψ 差異巨大,且缺少與具體臨床問題相結合的研究,缺少對國家和地區層面的研究與探討。
                Abstract:
                Through bibliometric analysis on the hospital accreditation related literature in Chinese journals from 1985 to 2017, this study provided a technical basis for future research priorities.MethodsThe Wanfang, CNKI, VIP database were used for retrieval of literatures, and descriptive statistical method was used to describe literatures information such as publication time, author affiliation, journal keywords, etc.ResultsA total of 13 432 articles were retrieved and 1 665 articles were included in the analysis. Between 1985 and 2011, the amount of published literature was small, and the cumulative amount did not exceed 50%. After 2011, the amount of published literature grew rapidly, which was basically positively correlated with the growth of hospital beds number in China. Beijing was the largest province which the authors came from, accounting for 16.06%. There was a huge difference in the amount of literature published between the eastern, the central and the western part of China, which was 56, 27.13 and 21.09 respectively. The amount of published literature was not proportional to the number of hospital beds in different province. According to Bradford's law to scatter the journals, there were 8 journals in the core category which were all hospital management journals, and the published literature accounted for 33.39% of the total literature. There were 13 high frequency keywords in 2414 keywords, which mainly related to medical quality, comprehensive evaluation, continuous improvement, quality of care, evaluation criteria, etc. Clustering analysis showed that the authors payed more attention to hospital quality and management.Conclusion The amount of literature on hospital accreditation in China between 1985 and 2017 was growing rapidly, the cumulative amount of literature varied greatly in different regions. There was a lack of research combined with specific clinical problems and research and discussion at the national and regional levels

                參考文獻/References:

                [1]高歡,王華,冉利梅. 國外醫院這種情況見色起性對誰來說都算是正常評審評價發展歷[J].中國醫院,2013,17(1):34-35

                相似文獻/References:

                [1]許晨瑩周易郭娜菲厲躍紅莊薇.我國護理質量評價研究的文獻計量學分析[J].中國衛生質量管理,2017,24(02):068.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2017.24.2.21]
                [2]羅雲婷 李歡 鄧蓉.患者安全文化文獻計量學分析[J].中國衛生質量管理,2018,25(06):052.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.6.18]
                [3]晏鑫 劉小平 郭梓鑫 龔斐 王蕾 施娣 梁辰.DRGs相關文獻計¤量學分析[J].中國衛生質量管理,2019,26(04):001.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.4.01]

                更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-28